Experts Say Proving Criminal Intent Will Be Crucial in NBA Gambling Cases

High-Profile Indictments Shake the NBA

Two NBA figures — Portland Trail Blazers head coach and Hall of Famer Chauncey Billups and veteran forward Terry Rozier — are facing federal charges in separate gambling-related cases. Prosecutors allege Billups helped lure high-stakes poker players to rigged games, while Rozier is accused of sharing insider information about his playing status that allowed bettors to cash in on prop bets.

The Challenge of Proving Intent

Legal experts say both cases hinge on one key question: intent. Proving that either man knowingly engaged in fraudulent activity could determine the outcome in court. “Even if Billups received money to bring high-stakes people to the games, that’s not illegal,” said former federal prosecutor Mitchell Epner. “What prosecutors must prove is that he knew the games were fixed and profited from it.”

Former prosecutor Evan Gotlob suggested the government likely has strong evidence, such as text messages or cooperating witnesses. “You don’t want to ruin someone’s life without really good evidence,” he said.

The Alleged Poker Scheme and “Fake Injury” Bet

Billups, 49, allegedly took part in poker games using hidden X-ray devices and rigged shufflers, though court documents do not specify his personal profit. His defense may argue that with his wealth and reputation, he had no motive to risk it all for minor gains.

Rozier, meanwhile, is accused of tipping off a friend about leaving a 2023 game early, leading to over $250,000 in successful bets. Prosecutors claim Rozier’s associate shared the insider information through text messages and later “counted the money” with him.

What Comes Next

Legal analysts say prosecutors will rely heavily on communications and cooperating witnesses to prove both cases. Defense attorneys will likely challenge intent, motive, and the credibility of witnesses as both men fight to protect their reputations.