AP’s Dangerous Language: How Softening Terms Like ‘Militants’ Fuels Terrorism

The Associated Press has long dictated the language of American journalism, but its refusal to use the term “terrorist” when describing groups like Hamas raises serious concerns. Instead, the AP opts for softer terms like “militant,” effectively downplaying the severity of their actions and contributing to a dangerous narrative. This linguistic manipulation shapes global perceptions, glossing over acts of extreme violence in favor of sanitized language. Roger Simon critiques the AP for its double standard, highlighting the implications of their words in enabling violence and propagating a biased worldview.